OUR APPROACH

Clarity is the editorial standard.

We publish useful explanations with sources, rather than price predictions or promises of returns.

Source and scope

Each article starts with a useful question. We consult original documentation and announcements, then build our own explanation around the reader’s needs. Links sit beside the sections they support. A project’s own claim is identified as such; a source citation is not an independent endorsement.

Original explanations

Changing a few words in someone else’s article is not our standard. We use our own structure and examples, explain the practical consequence of a fact, and leave out repetition. Direct quotations, when needed, must be brief, clearly marked and attributed. We do not invent personal experience, tests or interviews.

Corrections

Material corrections should preserve an explanation of what changed and why. Publication dates should not be refreshed for cosmetic edits. Source checks and publication dates have different meanings.

Authorship and sources

Articles are published under the ArbuzDAO name. Sources support factual claims; explanations and comparisons are our synthesis. A source-check date records when references were consulted, not a certification of human review. Our AI policy describes the assistance used to prepare content.

Have a question? Get in touch